As already announced in coverage of Margaret Atwood's Penelopiad (but as I've only just realized), that book was the first of a series conceived by Karen Armstrong and to be published by Canongate; and the series itself is now getting more press. Beside's Atwood's book, already published are: Weight, by Jeanette Winterson (Heracles and Atlas), and A Short History of Myth, by Karen Armstrong. On deck are: Lion's Honey, by David Grossman (Samson); Helmet of Horror, by Victor Pelevin (Theseus and the Minotaur); as well as offerings from Donna Tartt, A.S. Byatt, Alexander McCall Smith, Chinua Achebe, Milton Hatoum, Su Tong, Natsuo Kirino. Now for the "more press": Laura Miller in Salon.com has an article entitled "Why Myths Still Matter," which concludes as follows:
Today, our standards of literary excellence are intimately entwined with the idea of originality and individual expression. Myths, on the other hand, are communal. They are also stories first and foremost, and contemporary literary critics do not hold story in particularly high regard, when they regard it at all. Like depictions of sex, story is seen as appealing to people on the crudest level, to the lowest common denominator. A book that has nothing else to offer can still thrill hordes of unsophisticated readers with pure, page-turning plot.
The seminal modernist works that still define our idea of literary genius often referred to myth without actually partaking of it. Mythic fragments float through T.S. Eliot's "The Waste Land," but there are no stories in the poem. James Joyce's "Ulysses" is not the epic tale of a man's 10-year journey home from a foreign war; instead, the novel aims to elevate a day in the life of an ordinary fellow to the grandeur of a hero's adventures. When such works succeed, they succeed in a modern fashion, as unique, form-breaking innovations, but not as myth.
As exhilarating as the modernist experiment has been, it eventually collided with what appears to be a fact of human nature, the reality that our minds are built of stories. To stick with the metaphor above, a steady diet of books without stories turns out to be as appealing as a life without sex; some people take to it, but not many. At the same time, an explosion of media has immersed the average citizen in a cloud of competing voices, and those voices have learned that stories capture people's attention. In a culture where nearly everyone -- politicians, TV producers, journalists, advertisers -- talks obsessively about the power of stories, the very artists most associated with the telling of tales, novelists, seem the least comfortable doing it.
So the "Myths" series is very welcome. It reminds us that not every talented writer can or should aspire to the model of the novelist as iconoclastic Great Man. (It's no coincidence that some of highest-profile contributors to the series are women.) Both Atwood and Winterson weave less prestigious modes of storytelling -- gossip and memoir -- into their new versions of Greek myths. The best novels have always had at least a dash of both. And perhaps the best myths have, too. But underneath it all there is still the "something of great moment" that Lewis wrote about, a something that eludes definition. Perhaps Winterson puts it best when she writes, "These are the stories we tell ourselves to make ourselves come true."
Further: Telegraph (UK); Herald (Scotland); NY Newsday ; Korea Herald (subscription); Business Standard (India); Ha'aretz (Israel); Evansville Courier & Press (subscription); Philadelphia's City Paper; and the Guardian (review by Mary Beard), in a review article that goes beyond the series to treat Bettany Hughes' Helen of Troy: Goddess, Princess, Whore; Nigel Spivey's Songs on Bronze: The Greek Myths Retold, and mentions much more. I'll close with a quote from Beard:
There is, in fact, hardly a modern poet, playwright or novelist who has not engaged with, or meddled in, Greek myth - whether in the form of translations, adaptations or subversions, by writing sequels and prequels to the canonical tales, or presenting the stories from a different angle (often recently, as in Carol Ann Duffy's The World's Wife, from the point of view of the neglected women in the tale, Mrs Icarus, Mrs Midas and so on). In this sense, Canongate's new series, The Myths, which has commissioned "some of the world's finest writers" to rework a myth of their choice, is not quite so innovative as its publicity implies. Most of the writers had been (re)working along these lines already. That said, the two volumes that launch the series, by Jeanette Winterson and Margaret Atwood (alongside A Short History of Myth by Karen Armstrong, to set the theoretical scene), make an impressive opening.